So many people seem to place a lot faith these sites without really knowing anything about them. Like who provides funding, etc. To those who have supreme confidence in these sites, I challenge you to find out who is behind them. Who finances them.
Questions About Barack Obama's status as a "natural born citizen"
Who works for them. These sites are attempting to place themselves as a higher authority. The final arbiter of the facts. Another Reader hides their name. What were you saying? And I respond.
Recommended For You
In America we expect the accusers to present their evidence and not just let them go on fishing trips. You know like the NSA listening in on every phone conversation, I might not have any thing to hide but I also mite like to have the right to say something stupid and funny to a friend with out it being published world wide. Steve, you are the loser. I am not the accuser in this case. Those who brought the lawsuit are the accusers.
And they will get the opportunity to present their evidence in the courts.
And as is also the American way, Mr. Obama will get his chance to refute the evidence. And if he can provide the courts with the necessary evidence to clear this, he will win. If not, he will be shown to be ineligible to hold the office of President. This is a case for the Supreme Court, because it addresses issues with the enforcement of the Constitution. It will be their place to make the determination, because it was not clearly defined by any other means.
They will provide clarity to the definition and by whom it will be charged to verify this type of information in future elections. By the way Steve, what is you last name? Where do you live? What is your phone number? You have not been very forthcoming with your information in this forum either. Is Steve your real name, or is a cover? This is just a forum for folks such as ourselves to discuss topics such as this one. You are actually doing the very thing that you seem to be upset with those who are merely talking about what is going on with the election at the moment.
Remember it is about the issues, and as it turns out, this will end up being quite an important one concerning this campaign. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate. I know the best solution around the whole problem of if either Obama or McCain is eligible to be president — vote Libertarian, or vote Constitution, or vote Green.
If so, then someone must have unsealed it to determine that it was valid. But it must be valid, right? The link below gives details of that news conference. As for the lawsuit that Berg filed against Obama he released a 10 minute video explaining the details here:. If Obama could lie, so could Berg.
He also has a history of filing frivolous suits, as well as trying to convince people to buy into questionable conspiracy theories.conservadores2020.xtage.com.br/12082-como-tener.php
PrawfsBlawg: Berg v. Obama: Finding the proper defendants
Bill you incorrect in your statements. The bill was enacted in , not Presidential candidates must provide proof of their eligibility. Unfortunately, this may not play out before the election on Tuesday. But it will be heard before January.
- Site Navigation?
- Lawsuit questions Obama's eligibility for office - Washington Times.
- illinois state criminal records and inmates search!
- pre-employment background checks united metal products.
The electoral college does not cast votes until then. If it is shown that he does not meet the requirements, he will not become President. Even if he wins Tuesday. This will create a Constitutional mess that will have to dealt with by the Supreme Court.
Help Fight Misinformation.
This will eventually be put before the proper court and Obama will have to produce the requested documentation or be removed from consideration. I have done considerable research on this and I personally believe he can not prove it. If he could, he would have done so when it first came up. So he either A. Personally, it is sad that so many people seem perfectly willing to overlook such a huge issue. This goes straight to the core of the Constitution.
Do Trump’s assertions about Obama’s birthplace add up?
And it must be upheld, regardless of how popular a candidate may be at the time. These people should be angry at the DNC for putting forth a candidate that was not fully vetted. For if they had, it is quite likely they would win Tuesday with a legitimate candidate. The rest of your statements are equally in error.
- north dakota property tax search.
- Who are these people, really?.
- Post navigation.
- Questions About Barack Obama's status as a "natural born citizen" - Truth or Fiction?.
- Meet the Birthers?
Sorry, glitch there, not sure why. You can also verify that at gpoaccess. The citation is Public Law No. You really do need to do your research at more reliable sites, I hate to have to say. Every single one of your points was dead wrong. BUT regarding the topic at hand, who cares about the history of either Obama or Berg?
How can Panamanian-born McCain be elected president? I understand John McCain was born in Panama.
I thought the Constitution said you had to have been born in a state. A: Though born abroad, he is considered a natural-born U. Navy who was stationed in Panama in , when McCain was born. This has led to speculation as to whether McCain is a U. As a congressional act stated in But the State Department clarifies the issue, saying that the language is honored under section c of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
This is not the first time the question has been broached in a presidential election. Fellow Arizonian Barry Goldwater was born in the Arizona territory before it was a state. Like McCain, both were born to U.